I have had this discussion before and have come off sounding like an arrogant ass, but here I go again.

Langauge and its use evolves very quickly. The definition of literally has changed over time. Just how "I couldn't care less" and "I could care less" mean the same thing, the word "literally" has come to mean "figuratively." But don't take me word for it...

from http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/literally

"2 : in effect : VIRTUALLY
usage Since some people take sense 2 to be the opposite of sense 1, it has been frequently criticized as a misuse. Instead, the use is pure hyperbole intended to gain emphasis, but it often appears in contexts where no additional emphasis is necessary."

It is ironic that we are talking about the literal and non-literal usage of literally, but thinking about that makes my mind numb.

I agree with you that language changes over time, and I make that point whenver someone expresses dismay that "No problem" seems to have become a substitute for "You're welcome." However, using the word in the exact opposite way of its actual meaning steps beyond the evolution of language into downright stupidity.

That's my opinion, of course, and I could be wrong.

I don't think there is a right or wrong. if you are a big nerd like me, you get really excited by discussions about semantics and definitions, and when I try tostart one, people sometimes feel like I'm getting on their case. So I hope you didn't take my comment that way.

Oddly enough there was some commentary on the radio today that echoes my opinion in a more informed andd eloquent manner than I ever could. I couldn't find a transcript but here is a link to the audio.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4988053

I always assumed sportscasters for changing the definition of literally 180 degrees, but their is a pretty impressive list of authors who have used literally to mean the opposite, going back to Mark Twain, and maybe even before that (I can't remember who else he cited).